Logo

German Congress of Orthopaedics and Traumatology (DKOU 2025)

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie (DGOU), Deutsche Gesellschaft für Orthopädie und Orthopädische Chirurgie (DGOOC), Deutsche Gesellschaft für Unfallchirurgie (DGU), Berufsverband für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie (BVOU)
28.-31.10.2025
Berlin


Meeting Abstract

Long-term survival and functional outcomes of keeled vs. pegged glenoid components in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty

Moritz Kraus 1,2
Henry Gebauer 3
Asimina Lazaridou 1
Markus Scheibel 1,3
1Abteilung für Schulter- und Ellbogenchirurgie, Schulthess Klinik Zürich, Zürich, Schweiz
2Klinik für Traumatologie, Universitätsspital Zürich, Zürich, Schweiz
3Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery (CMSC), Charité - Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Deutschland

Text

Objectives and questions: The glenoid component and its fixation in bone are critical factors for implant longevity in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA). This study compares long-term survival rates of keeled and pegged glenoid components.

Material and methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 90 patients who underwent aTSA between 2011 and 2016. Patients were divided into three groups: Keeled-CoCr (n=38): Keeled glenoid components with cobalt-chromium humeral components, Pegged-CoCr (n=14): Pegged glenoid components with cobalt-chromium humeral components, and Pegged-Titanium (n=38): Pegged glenoid components with titanium-coated humeral components.

Propensity-score matching was performed between the Keeled-CoCr and Pegged-Titanium groups to control for confounders such as age, sex, and glenoid morphology. The primary outcome was implant survival, analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves and log-rank tests. Secondary outcomes included clinical scores (Constant Score), glenohumeral distance (GHD) at baseline and after 5 years, and changes in GHD over time. Data were compared using Kruskal-Wallis and Wilcoxon tests with a significance level of 0.05.

Results: The groups showed no significant differences in age (Keeled-CoCr: 69.0 [60.2; 73.8], Pegged-CoCr: 68.0 [63.8; 69.8], Pegged-Titanium: 68.0 [57.0; 73.0], p=0.889), sex distribution (male: 47.4%, 28.6%, 50%, p=0.375), or glenoid morphology (p=0.919).

Implant survival was significantly longer for Keeled-CoCr components (102 [79.8; 128] months) compared to Pegged-CoCr (66.0 [60.5; 74.5] months) and Pegged-Titanium (73.0 [36.0; 95.2] months, p<0.0001). Survival in the Keeled-CoCr group was significantly longer than Pegged-CoCr (p=0.004) and Pegged-Titanium (p=0.001), with no significant difference between the two pegged groups (p=0.521).

Constant Scores were significantly higher in the Keeled-CoCr group (80.0 [73.0; 83.0]) compared to Pegged-CoCr (37.5 [26.8; 55.0]) and Pegged-Titanium (32.5 [24.2; 46.5], p<0.001). Scores for Keeled-CoCr were significantly better than both pegged groups (p<0.001), with no significant difference between Pegged-CoCr and Pegged-Titanium (p=0.499).

Revision rates were lower for Keeled-CoCr (13%) compared to Pegged-CoCr (53%) and Pegged-Titanium (53%, p<0.001). The GHD showed no significant differences at baseline (p=0.126) or after 5 years, nor did the reduction in GHD over time: Keeled-CoCr: 1.30 [0.80; 2.30], Pegged-CoCr: 2.60 [1.02; 3.58], Pegged-Titanium: 2.40 [1.20; 3.00], p=0.231.

Discussion and conclusions: Our results suggest that keeled glenoid components may have better long-term survival and functional outcomes than pegged components in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty. However, this study focuses on a singleimplant from one manufacturer. Further research is needed to confirm whether these findings apply to other designs and brands.