Logo

27. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Audiologie und Arbeitstagung der Arbeitsgemeinschaft Deutschsprachiger Audiologen, Neurootologen und Otologen

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Audiologie e. V. und ADANO
19.-21.03.2025
Göttingen


Meeting Abstract

Hearing-in-noise deficits – clinical measures and prescription of advanced hearing-aid features

Johannes Zaar 1,2
Søren Laugesen 3
Sébastien Santurette 4
Gary Jones 5
Marianna Vatti 4
Chiemi Tanaka 6,7
Peter Ihly 8
Tim Jürgens 8
1Eriksholm Research Centre, Snekkersten, Dänemark
2Hearing Systems Section, Department of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark, Kongens Lyngby, Dänemark
3Interacoustics Research Unit, Kongens Lyngby, Dänemark
4Centre for Applied Audiology Research, Oticon A/S, Smørum, Dänemark
5Demant A/S, Smørum, Dänemark
6Oticon Japan, Kawasaki, Japan
7Diatec Japan, Kawasaki, Japan
8Institute of Acoustics, University of Applied Sciences Lübeck, Lübeck, Deutschland

Text

The pure-tone audiogram is the main clinical diagnostic used for assessing hearing loss and provides the basis for prescribing hearing-aid amplification to restore audibility. However, the audiogram does not necessarily reflect the hearing-in-noise deficits that can remain when audibility has been restored, which can manifest themselves, e.g., in poor speech understanding in adverse conditions. A clinical measure of such deficits would thus be highly useful for prescribing advanced hearing-aid features designed to counteract hearing-in-noise deficits, such as powerful deep neural network (DNN) based noise reduction algorithms.

To enable assessment of hearing-in-noise deficits in the clinic, we have conducted multiple research studies optimizing spectro-temporal modulation (STM) detection tests for hearing-impaired listeners such that the measured STM performance predicts the listeners’ speech-in-noise performance [1], [2]. These studies resulted in the development of a clinical test paradigm called the Audible Contrast Threshold (ACTTM) test, a novel quick-and-simple clinical STM detection test with built-in audibility compensation [3].

We evaluated ACT in a large-scale clinical study with 100+ participants in terms of test-retest reliability, testing time, and predictive power with regard to aided speech-in-noise performance. Speech reception thresholds (SRTs) were measured with participants using Oticon More 1 hearing aids in a challenging setting with spatially distributed speech interferers. Four different hearing-aid settings were tested: amplification only, mild directionality and noise reduction (DIR+NR), medium DIR+NR, and strong DIR+NR, using Oticon’s DNN-based help-in-noise feature.

The ACT test was found to be quick (<2 minutes) and reliable. On the group level, SRTs were highest for the amplification-only setting and decreased with increasing levels of DIR+NR processing. The individual SRTs collected with amplification only were strongly correlated with ACT and – to a lesser extent – with the 4-frequency pure-tone average (PTA4). The predictive power of ACT and PTA4 was found to be complementary, as they both contributed significantly to predicting the amplification-only SRTs in a two-predictor linear regression model. The individual SRT benefit induced by different levels of DIR+NR varied substantially across participants, with poor performers benefiting most from strong DIR+NR. A dedicated analysis showed that the variability in SRT benefit was correlated with the closedness of acoustic coupling and with ACT.

Overall, the results suggest that ACT is a clinically viable hearing-in-noise test that can be used to prescribe advanced hearing-aid features, especially DIR+NR features that improve the speech-to-noise ratio. Special attention should be paid to the effects of acoustic coupling on the real-life efficacy of DIR+NR processing.


References

[1] Zaar J, Simonsen LB, Dau T, Laugesen S. Toward a clinically viable spectro-temporal modulation test for predicting supra-threshold speech reception in hearing-impaired listeners. Hear Res. 2023 Jan;427:108650. DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2022.108650
[2] Zaar J, Simonsen LB, Laugesen S. A spectro-temporal modulation test for predicting speech reception in hearing-impaired listeners with hearing aids. Hear Res. 2024 Mar 1;443:108949. DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2024.108949
[3] Zaar J, Simonsen LB, Sanchez-Lopez R, Laugesen S. The Audible Contrast Threshold (ACT) test: A clinical spectro-temporal modulation detection test. Hear Res. 2024 Nov;453:109103. DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2024.109103