Logo

Gesundheit gestalten

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Allgemeinmedizin und Familienmedizin (DEGAM), Deutsche Gesellschaft für Sozialmedizin und Prävention (DGSMP), Netzwerk Evidenzbasierte Medizin e.V. (EbM), Deutsche Gesellschaft für Medizinische Soziologie (DGMS)
30.09.2026-02.10.2026
Göttingen

Meeting Abstract

A typology of methodological research: a consensus study on study types and boundaries

Julian Hirt - University of Bern, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Clinical Research, Bern, Schweiz; Eastern Switzerland University of Applied Sciences, Department of Health, Schweiz; University of Adelaide, JBI Centre for Evidence-Based Healthcare Eastern Switzerland, Adelaide, Australien
Malena Chiaborelli - University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Department of Clinical Research, CLEAR-Methods Centre, Basel, Schweiz
Livia Puljak - Catholic University of Croatia, Center for Evidence-Based Medicine, Kroatien
Zachary Munn - University of Adelaide, School of Public Health, Health Evidence Synthesis, Recommendations and Impact, Adelaide, Australien
Hanan Khalil - La Trobe University, Department of Public Health, School of Psychology and Public Health, Australien
Dawid Pieper - Brandenburg Medical School (Theodor Fontane), Faculty of Health Sciences Brandenburg, Institute for Health Services and Health System Research, Deutschland; Brandenburg Medical School (Theodor Fontane), Center for Health Services Research, Deutschland
Anne-Laure Boulesteix - LMU Munich, Faculty of Medicine, Institute for Medical Information Processing, Biometry and Epidemiology, Munich, Deutschland; Munich Center for Machine Learning, Munich, Deutschland
Georg Heinze - Medical University of Vienna, Center for Medical Data Science, Institute of Clinical Biometrics, Vienna, Österreich
Richard Hooper - Queen Mary University of London, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, London, Großbritannien
Matthias Briel - University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Department of Clinical Research, CLEAR-Methods Centre, Basel, Schweiz
Stefan Schandelmaier - University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Department of Clinical Research, CLEAR-Methods Centre, Basel, Schweiz; University of Pécs, Medical School, MTA–PTE Lendület, Pécs, Ungarn

Text

Background: Methodological research (MR) aims to develop, evaluate, refine, guide, or implement research methods or synthesize existing MR. In the context of health research, many types of MR are published in journals, but their definitions, boundaries, and terminology are inconsistent and unclear.

Aim/scientific question: To propose an initial version of a new typology of MR.

Material & Methods: An international team of 11 methodologists developed the typology through a consensus process that included multiple rounds of discussion, feedback. We tested the typology by applying it to 52 MR papers published in 26 journals . For each type of MR, we provided a definition, examples, possible labels, and clarified boundaries between types. We made subjective decisions explicitly and recorded consensus and remaining disagreements.

Resultes: We defined types of MR along two cross-cutting dimensions: approach (“How can we answer MR questions?”) and purpose (“What is the MR question?”). Approach-based types include theorybased MR; simulation studies, MR based on real datasets, reliability and agreement studies, consensus, meta-epidemiological studies, qualitative studies involving researchers, and syntheses of MR. Purpose-based types include identifying available methods, proposing a new method, comparing the performance of existing methods, summarizing MR, assessing methodological practice, developing guidance for applying, reporting or assessing methods, and methodological implementation science. The testing revealed challenging types and grey areas related to current reporting of MR. At the conference, we will present the latest version of the typology and discuss possible applications and research needs in the field of MR.

Discussion: The proposed typology provides a structured framework for classifying MR, helping to clarify terminology and highlight the diversity of approaches and purposes in this field. By making definitions and boundaries explicit, it supports more consistent communication and understanding of MR. Further user-testing is needed to refine and validate its categories.

Take Home Message: The new typology uncovers a broad spectrum of available types of MR and provides clarity for those who plan and perform methodological research. The open web format encourages further development and international collaboration.

Competing interests: None to declare.