25dkou584 10.3205/25dkou584 urn:nbn:de:0183-25dkou5844 Meeting Abstract Tinner Tinner Christian C

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Schweiz

author Häckel Häckel Sonja S

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Schweiz

author Geismar Geismar Chiara C

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Schweiz

author Schaible Schaible Samuel S

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Schweiz

author Broger Broger Ivan I

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Kantonsspital Graubünden, Chur, Schweiz

author Schoenborn Schoenborn Veit V

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Kantonsspital Graubünden, Chur, Schweiz

author Albers Albers Christoph C

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Schweiz

author German Medical Science GMS Publishing House

Düsseldorf

610 20251031 engl This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Dieser Artikel ist ein Open-Access-Artikel und steht unter den Lizenzbedingungen der Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (Namensnennung). M0634 584 Deutsche Gesellschaft für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Deutsche Gesellschaft für Orthopädie und Orthopädische Chirurgie Deutsche Gesellschaft für Unfallchirurgie Berufsverband für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Deutscher Kongress für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie (DKOU 2025) Abstracts | Wirbelsäule 3 Berlin 20251028 20251031 AB93-4433 TextObjectives and questions: Unstable thoracolumbar fractures often require circumferential (360°) fusion for adequate stabilization. However, debate remains over whether a single-stage or two-stage procedure yields superior outcomes. This study aims to determin wheter single-stage or two-stage 360° fusion leads to a more favourable course regarding hospital stay, operative time, blood loss, and perioperative morbidity.Material and methods: We conducted a retrospective, bicentric analysis of 184 adult patients (Injury Severity Score ≤15) with acute unstable thoracolumbar fractures (T10–L3, AO Spine types A–C) treated at two Swiss Level I trauma centers within 6 years. All patients received 360° fusion, with first treatment within 48 hours of presentation. One center routinely performed a single-stage procedure, whereas the other favored a two-stage operation. Baseline demographics, fracture patterns, and neurological status were extracted from electronic records. The primary endpoint was total hospital length of stay. Secondary endpoints included cumulative operative time, intraoperative blood loss, and in-hospital mortality. Results: Of 184 enrolled individuals, 104 underwent single-stage and 80 underwent two-stage surgery. Patient characteristics (median age ~42 years, male proportion ~58%, median ASA 2) were comparable between groups, although neurological deficits were significantly more prevalent in the two-stage cohort (35% vs. 6.8%). Single-stage surgery demonstrated a shorter median hospital stay of 9 days (IQR 7-11) compared to 11 days (IQR 9-14) in the two-stage group. Operative time was reduced in the single-stage approach with a median of 195 minutes (IQR 158.5-231.5) versus 230 minutes (IQR 184.8-275.3), and blood loss was lower at 500 mL (IQR 300-700) versus 750 mL (IQR 432.5-1067.5) (Figure 1 ). No in-hospital deaths were observed. Subgroup analyses stratified by decompression status revealed that these differences were most pronounced among patients who underwent the additional intervention (Table 1 ).Discussion and conclusions: In this bicentric study, single-stage 360° fusion for unstable thoracolumbar fractures was associated with significantly shorter hospitalization, operative time, and blood loss compared with a two-stage approach—particularly in patients requiring decompression. Although these findings stem from retrospective, institution-specific practices, they underscore the potential advantages of a single-stage strategy. Prospective studies with standardized complication reporting, long-term follow-up, and cost analyses are warranted to confirm these benefits and guide individualized treatment decisions. 11

Table 1: Operative and Clinical Outcomes: Primary Analysis and Subgroup Analyses

1

1 1 Figure 1: Main Outcomes (1-stage versus 2-stage group)

1 0 0